Kenda K.O.T Tire - Tested

by Mike Levy
Nov 16, 2011 at 22:57

Kenda K.O.T The K.O.T, which is an acronym for 'King of Traction', has been designed to excel in extremely soft or muddy conditions, making use of a tread pattern that is far more aggressive than a standard all around tire. While the cornering knobs are among the tallest that we've ever seen, the tire's central section features lower lugs that should retain decent rolling speed when it counts. A harder rubber compound has also been used for the same reason, as well as keeping the tall side lugs from becoming overly flexible. The K.O.T can be had in 1.8'', 2.1'' and 2.35" sizes, as well as in either wire or folding bead versions. The 2.35" folding option that is reviewed here uses Kenda's DLR (Dual Layer Rubber) compound, weighed 782 grams on our scale and retails for $53 USD.

Kenda K.O.T
Kenda's K.O.T uses tall side lugs and an open pattern to excel in muddy or soft trail conditions.

Kenda K.O.T details:

- Intended use: soft conditions/mud
- Width: 1.8'', 2.1'', 2.35'' (measured at 2.4'')
- 120 TPI (threads per inch)
- Weight: 747 grams (claimed), 782 grams (actual)
- MSRP: $53 USD

The details: Kenda's K.O.T looks nothing like a standard mountain bike tire. Its most prominent feature are the extremely aggressive cornering lugs that are almost comically huge when compared to the rest of the tread. Angled out slightly from the casing, these cone shaped lugs depend on a huge base, further supported with an even wider foundation, in an effort to have them penetrate the ground instead of folding over.

The center section of the K.O.T consists of smaller diameter knobs, all of a lower height than the cornering lugs, laid out across the crown of the tire, making for a very open layout that should clear the stickiest of mud quite well. The result of the massive cornering knobs and relatively minimal center tread is a tire that looks similar to a cut down mud spike that you'd be likely to see at a muddy downhill race. The top of each and every knob features sipes that add more biting edges and allow the face of the knobs to flex and hold better.

Kenda constructs the K.O.T with two different rubber compounds: a soft 42a on the outside of every knob that offers a slow rebound rate - ideal for wet roots and rocks - and a much stiffer 65a underneath that adds support to each lug. The harder compound underneath should also prevent entire knobs from being ripped off, a sometimes common trait of tires that use a combination of tall knobs and soft compounds.

Kenda K.O.T tire
Smaller diameter knobs span the crown of the tire (top, left), while massive cornering lugs give the K.O.T and very square profile (top, right)

Performance: Our folding bead K.O.Ts installed quite easily, seating correctly without requiring excessive pressure to do so. Surprisingly, the K.O.T actually measured slightly wider than claimed, with our calipers showing a width of 2.4" at the widest point of the tread when fitten to our Specialized Roval Traverse EL wheelset (26mm outer rim width, 22mm inner). We spent time with the tires inflated as low as 22psi and as high has 35psi, with the best results coming with them in the low to mid 30s. This pressure, which is slightly higher than we expected them to perform at, lets the serious looking tread layout do all the work. If the conditions are right, meaning muddy and slippery trails, going from a standard tire to the K.O.T is an eye opening experience. When running it on the back of my trail bike there were countless times when I easily powered up steep pitches that had my riding partners, with their all around rubber choices, walking behind me. I was actually a bit surprised at the climbing traction that the K.O.T has on tap given the tire's less aggressive center section, but it soon became clear that the flat, square top profile was also engaging the tire's burly cornering lugs, even though I was dead upright. The result was velcro-like climbing traction in the slop, with the pointy, stiff lugs biting hard to keep me moving forward.

Despite the square profile, the K.O.T doesn't have that always scary on/off feel when leaning over in the slop (although it is a different story in the dry). The flat top profile, created by the massive side lugs, results in a prominent cornering edge that literally cuts through the nastiest of mud instead of floating on the surface. In the worst conditions, where an all around tire simply becomes a rudder and the goal is just to stay up, the K.O.T offers a degree of predictability that allows you to actually choose a line and hold it. As expected, the tread pattern clears mud exceptionally well, throwing up a rooster tail of slop as it cleans itself while spinning.

Braking traction in the mud is also impressive, with the tire's large footprint doing all it can to slow you down. Extremely hard packed and slippery ground saw the tire break free easier when on the binders, with the tall cornering lugs flexing instead of penetrating into the hard ground. The sensation was a sudden loss of traction. But then again, there aren't too many options out there that can perform in those circumstances.

Kenda K.O.T tire
The K.O.T's square profile creates a biting edge that cuts through the slop to find traction.

It shouldn't really come as a surprise that a mud specific tire performs well in the mud, but it's how the K.O.T handles intermediate, drying conditions that had us really impressed. Rolling speed over dry ground isn't nearly as bad as you would expect from looking at the tire's design, largely due to its low center section that resembles a cut down spike. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that the K.O.T carries speed as well as many all around designs, but clearly not at the same level as a tire designed solely for dry conditions. Hard cornering in the dry revealed an on/off feel, but that shouldn't come as a surprise given the K.O.T's extremely square profile. With that said, cornering traction is there as long as the ground isn't rock hard.

Issues: The K.O.T offers some serious performance advantages in the right environment, but like many things that are so condition specific, it also has a few major drawbacks. Wet woodwork or roots can be downright frightening, with the tire skating across their surfaces, despite Kenda's claims that the softer 42a outer rubber of the DLR compound helps during those times. While we understand the compromise that needs to be made to have the tire perform well in soft dirt and mud, its performance on wood had us treading very carefully for our liking.

The tire's square profile also make for an extremely on/off feel when on hardpack. This could be dealt with when the tire was run solely out back, but it really emphasized the fact that the K.O.T doesn't perform well when mounted up front. In fact, we wouldn't recommend using a K.O.T up front regardless of how muddy the trails are. Doing so results in surprisingly bad handling, with the sensation of the bike wanting to low-side instantly when leaned past a certain point.

It also needs to be said that the K.O.T will leave more trail damage in its wake than a traditional tire. Given that you are looking to install it for riding in the mud, this may not be an issue for your local trails. Areas with more sensitive trail environments are not an ideal location to use the K.O.T.

Pinkbike's take:
bigquotesKenda's K.O.T allows you to ride in muddy conditions with a surprising amount of control, but such performance does come at a cost. It likely isn't the best choice if your trails are covered in roots, and is so condition specific that it's hard for us to recommend using it unless you have a serious wet riding season like we do in British Columbia. We also need to stress that the K.O.T should be ruled out for use up front - this is a rear tire only. But there is no denying that the K.O.T offers an advantage in the mud that a standard tire can't even come close to approaching. Riders who have fitted a K.O.T to the back of their bike will certainly have an advantage in the slop compared to their riding partners who are using standard tires.- Mike levy

www.kendausa.com


Must Read This Week

90 Comments

  • + 36
flag darrentheclaw (Dec 28, 2011 at 2:38)
 Kot means "feces" in German, just saying lol
  • + 8
flag detroit1 (Dec 28, 2011 at 5:39)
 Kot mean ''cat'' Smile
  • + 7
flag Dhracer97 (Dec 28, 2011 at 9:40)
 Iam pretty sure iv'e slept on a kot before
  • + 16
flag KennyKillsIt (Dec 28, 2011 at 10:10)
 Kots are uncomfortable to sleep on just like I'm sure this tire would be too. KOT tires, I'm sure, are great at staying on track through fields of fecal matter or fecal matter like substances as well as mashing up cats in the process so I think the name is justifiable
  • + 2
flag airbornmtnbiker (Dec 28, 2011 at 18:53)
 I like how you say both the strengths AND weaknesses and don't hold back criticism at all. Well done pinkbike, good review!
  • + 3
flag nickf (Dec 28, 2011 at 21:49)
 you've discovered Kenda's underlying intention of having you ride of feces. They've been KOT!
  • + 1
flag coolj43 (Dec 29, 2011 at 9:40)
 Reminds me of a tioga white tiger! Terrible for up front use!
[Reply]
  • + 8
flag Schmitty (Dec 28, 2011 at 6:22)
 I've been running Wet Screams front and back for years and was always pleased with the performance. This year I trimmed down the middle rows on the rear tire and I believe it brakes better and rolls a ton faster. I also picked up a pair of Dirty Dans for my DH bike. Last weekend I rode the DD's through the longest, foamiest, craziest "mud garden" I've ever seen and I had maximum traction. Also, the advertised 2.35 DD looks a lot wider than the 2.4 advertised WS. I was completely impressed with the DD's! Wet Screams rock, but Dirty Dan's are PUNK ROCK! Get some and get yourself some!
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag T10irons (Dec 28, 2011 at 4:58)
 With the poor quality of Kenda products is the past it will take more than a new tread pattern to get me to switch back from Maxxis. I find it hard to believe that they didn't rip any of the knobs off (or sidewall, bead, or complete tire detonation).
  • + 2
flag esstinkay (Dec 28, 2011 at 7:58)
 I'll second that.
  • + 2
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 9:09)
 The KOT is far from a new tire, it's been around for years. It is also quite different than anything Maxxis offeres... a very different casing shape, tread layout and feel. No reliability issues.
  • + 2
flag Deryck (Dec 28, 2011 at 11:31)
 I've been riding them for a couple of years in all sorts of conditions and haven't managed to crack or tear off any lugs.
The review was spot on.
Incredible in the deep slop, terrifying over roots or really hard packed ground.
  • + 1
flag morgan (Dec 28, 2011 at 19:04)
 Well put. So true.
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag Mudstud (Dec 28, 2011 at 3:04)
 I've been using Kenda's KOT (2.35 foldable) during the last two years - mainly in winter and spring, when the trails get really muddy in Switzerland or are covered with snow. In the mud, these puppies excel and make the difference between sliding out of control and carving turns with precision. As soon as there's some hardpack or rooty stuff as well (or even paved roads on the way to the trails), they do get really annoying, though: Do NOT try to take your hands off the handlebar when you've got a KOT mounted up front (yes, I do that), the front wheel is going to go anywhere but in a straight line.
But in soft snow and mud, I absolutely love their performance. And yes, no other mud tire looks as mean as these - but then again, the others are likely to be better all-round performers.
  • + 0
flag bigburd (Dec 28, 2011 at 4:06)
 Why do they say it's not good to be ran as front tire ? Most people run spike front and dry rear.
I can't see why it would be bad
  • + 2
flag Mudstud (Dec 28, 2011 at 6:02)
 The boxy, square-edged shape ruins the cornering handling on harder surfaces - as all riders know who have been biking long enough to have ridden Panaracer's Smoke up front (before the Dart came out). But as the studs on the shoulders are flexible (which is a pain on tarmac, see postong above), the tire does not simply fall over once it reaches a certain lean. I'd rather go for a KOT up front and a Wet Scream (which looks pretty toothless next to a KOT) in the back.

As for the width and why there's no 2.5 inch version: Mud clearance is the key here, folks
  • + 1
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 9:07)
 @bigburd - The tires super square profile gives it an extremely on/off feel when used up front in the dry. Not for front use.
  • + 1
flag bigburd (Dec 28, 2011 at 9:49)
 Strange , do Kenda offer a spike for the front then ? Surely they can't just have rear spikes in their range?
  • + 2
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 10:46)
 It isn't marketed as "rear only" but after briefly using it up front I couldn't imagine a time and place where it would be ideal. The Telonix would likely make a better choice: http://www.kendausa.com/en/home/bicycle/mountain/telonix.aspx
  • + 2
flag leelau (Dec 28, 2011 at 13:04)
 I've used the Telonix and as Mike suggests its a pretty decent wet weather front tire. It doesn't clear mud as well as a dedicated mud tire but there you have it. Another thing that I'd imagine that the KOT would suffer in is steep braking as a front tire as there's not much in the way of lateral lugs for braking.
  • + 1
flag lenmerderdenfer (Dec 29, 2011 at 9:46)
 I used the Telonix (front and rear) in 2011 wet French alpine weather and I found them quite nice for grip while shedding the mud instantly, keeping in mind the hills are pretty steep here. On another note, the casing is rubbish! I received three defective Telonix tires form CRC with which they honored the Kenda/CRC warranty honorably. One even had a whole in the casing between the bead cord and the sidewall whereas, the others had severe tread pattern and casing deformities. I finally got two ok tires that ripped to shreds in the dry part of the lift access season (casing and kevlar bead included). I loved them some and hated them a lot.
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag manhattanprjkt83 (Dec 28, 2011 at 6:58)
 this tire isn’t new, and it isn’t a wetscream competitor...It's a nasty conditions trail tire with light casing and decent volume, they are awesome for the indented use, maxxis really doesn’t have anything like this out there.
  • - 6
flag kdawg123 (Dec 28, 2011 at 14:08) (Below Threshold) show comment
 high rollers and minions for life thats all i will ever ride
  • + 1
flag 3lfd3wd (Dec 29, 2011 at 7:47)
 Medusa manhattan?
[Reply]
  • + 6
flag IllestT (Dec 28, 2011 at 8:49)
 I don't know how it is over the pond, but Kenda is seen as a complete joke-brand in the UK.
Looks like more of the same
  • + 3
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 9:11)
 They certainly don't get the love that Maxxis or other companies receive, but I'm a huge fan of the Excavator - great all around tire at a great price. The KOT is very condition specific..
  • + 1
flag collin7 (Dec 30, 2011 at 23:30)
 I was highly impressed with my excavators as well! Other than the weight... but for the most part, it was worth the trade-off.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag mikeybike (Dec 28, 2011 at 13:56)
 I hope you aren't taking any of these comments personally Mike. I read the review and I see you have some great points. Most of these comments seem to be everyone's opinion, whether they are valid or not. Opinions are like a*sholes, everyone has one. Having ridden for more years that most Pinkbike followers seem to have been alive, I get where you are coming from. The large lugs with the stiffer compound under the soft compound should do the trick in the deep slop. Being from Alberta if you have the balls to ride in the mud this tire might just do the trick, nothing I have ever tried works! Alberta mud is like riding on a Wet Banana! Thanks for the great writeup Mike, keep up the great work.
  • + 1
flag finnrambo (Dec 28, 2011 at 19:36)
 the difference between a*sholes and opinions: one can be surgically removed
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag g-monster (Dec 30, 2011 at 10:18)
 good write up! you covered all departments of this tire well and was insightful. A few comments though, I would expect this tire to be junk in the dry/hard pack because it is a mud specific tire, nothing else. also, I do not understand this trend of running a mud spike in the rear and something else in front. If you look at Greg Minnaar or Steve Peat they run the exact same tire front AND rear (barring special circumstances i.e. Canberra, Sea Otter, Fontana etc. for pedaling type scenarios) because it creates predictability front to rear. bit of a rant, but felt strongly about this. Again, excellent write up, keep up the good work and I look forward to the next tests and reviews!!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag rx1ton (Dec 28, 2011 at 14:17)
 These are best setup with KOT front and narrow inter/soft tire back. Lean it into the softstuff and she flies. Yes roots are tough with these. Turn wide and dont be afraid to find an out of corner line to really crank it. Rear only would be pointless.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag manhattanprjkt83 (Dec 28, 2011 at 10:23)
 The comments about not running as a front tire are wack. A tire like this gives you more advantage in the front than anything...not sure what is going on with all that.

Obviously the tire is a condition specific tire, why would anyone test/ride it in a dry climate?
  • + 3
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 11:03)
 Have you used one up front? The tire's mega square profile gives it an extremely on/off feel... not predictable at all. Casing shape plays a very large roll in how a tire behaves, not just how aggressive the tread pattern is =)

Re. your question about riding the KOT in a dry climate, most riders don't change out their tires depending on the day's conditions or particular trail they are riding. Instead they put on a tire and ride it until it becomes worn and needs to be replaced. During that time one is bound to ride in the dry, not just in the muddiest and worst conditions. Yes, it's a mud specific tire hence "While we understand the compromise that needs to be made to have the tire perform well in soft dirt and mud..." Secondly, trail conditions change in a single ride... part of the trail may be muddy, followed by a long stretch of high ground or wood bridges.
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag lenmerderdenfer (Dec 28, 2011 at 1:17)
 Go with "Schwalbe Dirty Dan" upfront and in the back too. Great profile, awesome durometers, unparalleled finish and hook up in all conditions. They're flippin' wild!
  • + 2
flag bigburd (Dec 29, 2011 at 2:41)
 I ordered my self a dirty dan a few days ago , can't wait for it to arrive then I might be able to get down my mates new track !
  • + 1
flag lenmerderdenfer (Dec 29, 2011 at 9:30)
 Hello bigburd, Did you only order one? One thing is for sure with these tires, if you're on a long flat section you're going to build some muscles fast.
  • + 1
flag bigburd (Dec 29, 2011 at 9:42)
 Yeah only one , I like to run a intermediate tire on the back to counter the drag , but am considering buying one for the rear.
The problem I have is my local trails near my house are quite flat but the trails that I actually travel to every weekend are very steep .
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jackgolfgti (Dec 28, 2011 at 10:33)
 Try them for your selves there pretty damn good to be fair there a cut down spike and wet wood of any form is as slippy as baby oil on an FHM shoot give them a whirl you will be surprised

http://www.cycletyre.com/
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag dirtdoctor (Dec 28, 2011 at 20:29)
 On-off, skate across rocks and roots. This sums up EVERY Kenda product I've tested. And you forgot to mention poor poor poor quality. In other words, death rubber. If conditions are bad enough to need a tire like this, then you shouldn't be on the trails anyways... well unless you're racing i guess.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag iamamodel (Dec 28, 2011 at 14:55)
 Mike, do you have an idea of how much riding you did on those to get that amount of wear?

I ask because the second photos show a tire that needs to be retired (no pun intended).
  • + 1
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 17:29)
 I'm not 100% certain but I'd take a rough guess and say over 50 rides. The tire pictured has actually done two tours of duty through different winters.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag suicidedownhiller (Dec 28, 2011 at 11:46)
 I think it should be noted that K.O.T.'s can be easily picked up for 10-20$ each new at races, they were even 15$ a pair at nationals, which might make them worth picking up. (Around here anyways)
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Pitcrew (Dec 28, 2011 at 0:10)
 Kinda funny, i picked one of these up after the windham GES race that was a slopfest, i havent even put it on a rim yet.....and its been 2yrs...
  • + 6
flag dave6797 (Dec 28, 2011 at 2:44)
 schwalbe dirty dans are the winner when it comes to wet tires!! they grip like its dry! and you can still use them in the dry! i saw steve smith riding them in france!!
Poo to you kenda
  • + 1
flag Pitcrew (Dec 28, 2011 at 21:36)
 Cant speak about Dirty Dans...i use to rock 2.4 Telonix's, i did pretty dam well in cat 2 in east coast muddy conditions. Or Hutchinson Bull Dogs....awesome tire as well in the mud/roots....
  • + 1
flag jmsxtreem (Dec 28, 2011 at 21:40)
 Specialized Hillbilly's blew my mind, amazing in the wet and dry plus theyre super fast rolling.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bmxxican (Dec 28, 2011 at 16:19)
 I use wtb timberwolves on my dh and they seem very Grippy on slick conditions.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag MrJackDeluxe (Dec 28, 2011 at 0:22)
 i d prefer Swampthings or Wetscreams!
  • + 1
flag Jacko6793 (Dec 28, 2011 at 0:56)
 i just bought some wetscreams UST 2.5" and they are amazing and they also look much meener than these + maxxis make you look cool and profesional
  • + 1
flag psyickphuk (Dec 28, 2011 at 2:10)
 ^lol hope you are no older than 11 to be saying shite like that
  • + 1
flag Jacko6793 (Dec 28, 2011 at 2:53)
 what sound better "i just got some kenda kots" or "i just got some maxxis wetscreams"??
  • + 12
flag PLC07 (Dec 28, 2011 at 4:39)
 Maybe it's just me but I wouldn't mind buying tires named dsjfnasikfbajfba fasfbaffbahawbdfab if they were the better choice. Performance over brand whoring.
  • + 1
flag jaydmf (Dec 28, 2011 at 10:42)
 I'll second swampys, definatly a go to tyre for me, only on the DH bike tho. AM/XC wise i just stick with one tyre all year round. Swampys are just perfect come winter if you wanna guarantee grip in all but a completely annihilated trail
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mcarswell (Dec 30, 2011 at 8:37)
 looks like a fail..id run maxxis ardents in the soup before id try to kill myself on some rocks with these.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag brodieman96 (Dec 28, 2011 at 19:22)
 why use this when you can get loose on highrollers in the rain its always fun to get loose on the trails when it rains
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag cmcgary (Dec 28, 2011 at 15:06)
 Anyone remember the old Panaracer "Porcupines?"
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Dylan-Honarbakht (Dec 29, 2011 at 1:31)
 These look like the would suck on sand chutes its the truth...
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag singletrailrider (Dec 28, 2011 at 0:17)
 I`d give her a go.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag VIPEYcc (Dec 28, 2011 at 2:07)
 Weight: claimed and actual ? Why do they lie ?
  • + 5
flag Ploutre (Dec 28, 2011 at 2:35)
 It's not a lie, it's just that each tire is different. The weight the company gives is an estimated mean value of some tires they made and measured. If they had a batch of 40 tires, they would probably have 40 different values. And the precision of the tool used to weight the tire influences the result.
  • + 3
flag SHWAGZ (Dec 28, 2011 at 3:22)
 Its due to the random error of the scales and manufacturing, same goes with the width. Just goes to show that physics sucks in class and in MTBing...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Chof (Dec 28, 2011 at 0:26)
 Kenda K.O.T = Cut Wetscream?
  • + 1
flag mini (Dec 28, 2011 at 1:05)
 was thinking so too.. thay look very simlar..

And in that case i think thay will be awsome in the front!
You just have to lean and press harder then with a normal tyer, and brake less to keep the gripp in corners Razz
  • + 1
flag Scythe888 (Dec 28, 2011 at 1:06)
 Kenda side lugs are bigger than the wetscream. Actually you mentioned it, is the same profile as the wetscream.
  • + 1
flag Ploutre (Dec 28, 2011 at 2:37)
 The Kenda has 3 knobs in the middle while the webscream has 2 ... Appart from that, I'd bet that all the mud tires look pretty much similar Smile
  • + 1
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 9:15)
 The KOT has a much more square profile than I think you'd be able to get on a cut Wetscream.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Ornelles (Dec 28, 2011 at 11:21)
 I don't ride in mud usually (I give in sometimes) It ruins the trails.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Ornelles (Dec 28, 2011 at 11:20)
 I try not to ride in the mud, the trails get ruined pretty easily.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag tyler-dixon (Dec 28, 2011 at 1:20)
 finnaly a half decent tire otta kenda
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag olynch (Dec 28, 2011 at 10:11)
 Could this review be any more contradicting...? You mention its poor in hardpacked conditions. Why are u riding them in hardpacked conditions, Its a full on Mud tyre.

And a bad side is trail damage.... Are you on crack? What sort of a poor excuse is that.

For the matter of the fact. I run these and more often then not they offer better performance then other brands due to faster rolling and still grip with high side knobs.
  • + 5
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 10:58)
 I mention that it's not great on hardpack for two reasons. First, most riders don't change out their tires depending on the day's conditions or particular trail they are riding. Instead they put on a tire and ride it until it becomes worn and needs to be replaced. During that time one is bound to ride in the dry, not just in the muddiest and worst conditions. Yes, it's a mud specific tire hence "While we understand the compromise that needs to be made to have the tire perform well in soft dirt and mud..." Secondly, trail conditions change in a single ride... part of the trail may be muddy, followed by a long stretch of high ground or wood bridges.

I didn't really mean to say that a downside of the tire is trail damage that it cause, just to be aware that the KOT will tear up ground much more than a standard tire will. Having used the tire on and off for multiple years, and riding behind others who are using the tire, this is a fact. Bottom line: if it that fact doesn't concern you, that's fine, you can disregard it.
  • + 5
flag leelau (Dec 28, 2011 at 13:10)
 Mike's quote was this: "Given that you are looking to install it for riding in the mud, this may not be an issue for your local trails. Areas with more sensitive trail environments are not an ideal location to use the K.O.T."

Not to pick you out olynch but I've noticed when I ride with Brits that that don't have a problem with riding any trail in any conditions, even if soaking wet. No matter even if the trail is trashed thereafter. I don't know why that is and have never really asked. For BC (not going to speak for all Canadians) we tend to try to stay on certain trails when its super wet or muddy. Usually trails with lots of rock and that aren't too steep. We'll leave the steep soft trails for dry conditions. Riding the KOT or say a Panaracer Spike on steep loamy trails when its wet will absolutely rape those trails. Makes sense/?
  • + 9
flag iamamodel (Dec 28, 2011 at 14:52)
 I was impressed that Mike mentioned their propensity to damage trails.

Trails are built by the few for the many - so the many should respect the work of the few.
  • + 2
flag olynch (Dec 29, 2011 at 9:37)
 Sorry for my outlash.

I was just quite annoyed at the fact you dont give this tyre a great name at all. I am going to be biased because i ride for Kenda here in the UK and they perform perfectly well and i use them over the winter for sloppy, messy, loose and loamy tracks and they perform very well. Id argue better then others because they have less drag with the cut down centre knobs. The contradicting comment is that you said it offers really good grip in the sloppy horrible conditions but then you say keep this tyre off the front wheel?

I think we (In the UK) just ride in any weather because we would never ride otherwise. Rains too much over here unfortunately.

I didnt like the Downside comment about the trail damage just because it seems like you didnt have much to say so just added that comment in there for the sake of it. I can see where your coming from though, I built alot of tracks at my local spots and they get smashed by people (including me) on spike tyres but i think us here in the UK just deal with it then after its been smashed and looks like a moto track, we adapt the track because they become more hardpacked and rutted so you rebuild it and they can become sweet tracks.
  • + 1
flag leelau (Dec 29, 2011 at 16:05)
 Thanks for the background olynch. It's always good to hear the perspective from a fellow trail builder - appreciate the knowledge back
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag DBomberMan (Dec 28, 2011 at 11:33)
 looks like the knobbies they throw on dirtbikes
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Orsumness (Dec 28, 2011 at 2:26)
 Why don't they come in a 2.5 size?
I hate the thin tyres
  • + 6
flag trailstar2danman (Dec 28, 2011 at 5:58)
 thin tyres are the way to go in the mud, 2.25/2.4
  • + 5
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 9:16)
 Mud tires are thinner so they can cut through the slop instead of floating on top of it all.
  • + 2
flag Orsumness (Dec 28, 2011 at 15:24)
 There you go!!!! Learn something new everyday. Thanks for that
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag retrofred (Dec 28, 2011 at 13:12)
 reminds me of the old panaracer spike tires.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Bikerhasi (Jan 2, 2012 at 13:14)
 What a shit tire
  • + 1
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Jan 2, 2012 at 14:26)
 Have you tried it? Why do you think that it's "shit"? Any actual experience with the KOT at all?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag SHARK555 Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 2:01)
 minions
  • + 11
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 9:14)
 Really? You do realize that the two tires are not comparable in the slightest, right? The Minion is intended as an all around aggressive tire, while the KOT is very condition specific and designed to be used in the mud. It makes no sense to say one is better than the other.
  • + 6
flag Knife-in-the-dark (Dec 28, 2011 at 9:28)
 Ha, you do know minions basically become slicks in the mud right?
  • + 1
flag SHARK555 Plus (Dec 29, 2011 at 1:54)
 twas a bit of sarcasm cause that's all i ever see on bikes. also, I dont have the luxury of having mulitple tires.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag vortex206 (Dec 28, 2011 at 10:12)
 kenda sucks!!! xD
  • + 3
flag mikelevy Mod Plus (Dec 28, 2011 at 11:06)
 Ok, but why? Have you had a bad experience, or just echoing what you've heard?
  • + 1
flag vortex206 (Jan 10, 2012 at 15:08)
 Just a bad experience, I've punctured with the kendas too much times and one time the tire exploded suddenly, and I wasn't riding that time, I was next to my bike and I heard a BAAAAAAM!! Well, may be the new generation of kendas is so much better, but if you don't want experiences like mines, don't buy an old kenda nevegal stick-e.
[Reply]

Post a Comment



You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
Copyright © 2000 - 2012. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv43 0.060125